tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7019460.post5526396560353404605..comments2021-05-22T05:42:21.977-05:00Comments on Scott's Journal: Spammers solving A.I. Problems?Scott Harmonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17920397744443984422noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7019460.post-56297974285392525572009-04-19T15:01:00.000-05:002009-04-19T15:01:00.000-05:00It's an interesting article... a part that drew my...It's an interesting article... a part that drew my attention was when they mention "Software that can solve any text-based CAPTCHA will be as much a milestone for artificial intelligence as it will be a problem for online security". This sounds like solving the halting problem :-) Which makes you wonder... in order for AI to be accomplished, does it mean we need to solve the halting problem? I don't think so. It would mean that intelligence is defined by an entity able to solve the halting problem. But as far as I know, <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_Conjecture" REL="nofollow">even humans are unable to do this</A>. So, I don't think you need so much as claimed in this article to be able to achieve AI.Apolo Imagodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10953715396943211536noreply@blogger.com